Burger King based this campaign on the flimsy concept that a jab against McDonald’s Happy Meals could somehow also promote Mental Health Awareness Month. After all, who doesn’t love using competition between giant corporations to contextualize important social issues?
Maybe you watched the video and thought, who cares? In one sense, you’re right — there are much more important things to be mad about happening every day. However, as a marketer, it’s hard not to be annoyed and offended by the trends this ad represents and reinforces: “purpose washing” and brand personification done poorly.
The campaign commodifies the struggle against mental health issues
In their video, Burger King lays out a variety of issues faced by people everywhere — generalized emotional distress, romantic issues, being mistreated at work, raising a child as a single parent — and reduces them to a market segment to whom they can sell fast food.
what meal you got for when i feel like you should pay your employees a living wage
My colleague Samir Patel has written about brands purpose washing their campaigns: “Companies who want to claim purpose as a core value need to go beyond saying they believe in being responsible, and actively stop doing things that may be in conflict with this — things that may be in an ethical grey area or unsustainable.”
Instead of looking at these real, significant problems rooted in our culture and political economy and seeking out real, transformative solutions, this ad simply urges sad people to buy the hamburgers made for sad people.
The product doesn’t even make any sense
All of these new combo items (the Blue Meal, the Yaaas Meal, the Pissed Meal, the Salty Meal, and the DGAF Meal) contain the same items: a Whopper, fries, and a drink. The only thing that changes is the copy and coloring of the packaging, making the whole exercise pretty condescending and cynical. The campaign claims to celebrate the wide range of human emotions, but if the exact same product is servicing all of these emotional states, it doesn’t seem like much of a celebration.
Beyond that, they chose the “emotions” for the variants extremely poorly. As Vox pointed out, “Yaaas” and “DGAF” aren’t emotions. “Pissed” is a terrible word to put in the name of your food. Nobody needs a reminder that Burger King food is “Salty.” There’s nothing clever, appetizing, or even descriptive about these names — they just serve as reminders of how lazy and forced the entire concept is.
Going even further, the idea of the “Happy Meal” that this campaign is criticizing is very specifically a product for children! The campaign states that “no one is happy all the time,” but this new offering isn’t even competing with Happy Meals.
Cynical purpose-washing campaigns don’t work
The video itself is clumsy. The tone swings wildly between “maudlin” and “irreverent” — the video can’t seem to decide whether or not it wants to be taken seriously.
What makes this campaign even more laughable is that it’s obviously — and predictably — being received poorly by the weary and wary Twitter community.
According to a quick social listening analysis, 43% of @BurgerKing’s engagement on Twitter has been negative in the wake of this campaign — compared to a baseline of about 14% over the past two months.
Back in 2013, it felt a little fresh when Denny’s ran a Tumblr full of silly GIFs and comments about TV shows. Fast-forward to 2019, and it feels like every unhealthy food brand is tweeting about their depression. Inauthentic brand personalities have become exhausting and grating.
Companies like Patagonia have crafted their entire business model and marketing around making a difference in their space. Even smaller companies like Everlane have authentically brought things like transparency and sustainability to life through every aspect of their business. It’s not an impossible task — it just requires you to put your money where your mouth is.
But if the prevalence of purpose-washing and cynical campaigns has you feeling down, don’t worry — there’s probably a Burger King combo for that.